ABSTRACT
Background: Despite special global considerations which have been made to prioritize vaccination of people with multiple sclerosis (MS), some are reluctant to get vaccinated. This study was aimed to evaluate the attitude toward coronavirus disease -2019 (COVID-19) vaccine and its probable correlations.Methods: Considering the study objectives, two valid questionnaires including Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S) and attitude questionnaires were administered pre and post COVID-19 vaccination among people with MS.Results: The questionnaires were administered among 349 people with MS pre and post vaccination. The mean age of participants was 38.78 +/- 8.68 (range: 19 to 64) years. They all received the first dose of COVID-19 vaccine (Sinopharm). Although about 90% of participants felt satisfied after getting vaccinated and respected the preventive actions like social distancing and wearing face mask after vaccination, about 40% of them did not recommend vaccination to other patients. None of the demographic data was predictor of attitude score in COVID-19 vaccine and the only effective factor regarding fear of COVID-19 among people with MS was gender (P = 0.001).
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an often-disabling disease of the central nervous system (CNS). The possible triggers of its first presentation such as stressful events, viral infections, vaccinations, and labor are still a matter of debate among scientists. Considering the possible role of infections in MS onset and the reported cases of CNS demyelination following COVID-19 infection and variety of COVID-19 vaccines, this study was conducted to investigate and compare the possible social, environmental, and physical triggers of MS onset before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Material(s) and Method(s): A cross-sectional study was conducted from 28 February 2022 to 9 June 2022. A researcher-made questionnaire was designed in MS research center of Iran and distributed as an online google form on social media among 1340 Iranian MS patients. Demographic information, MS disease-related data, possible MS triggers (stressful life events, COVID-19 and other infections, COVID-19 and other vaccines, pregnancy or labor, head trauma, surgery, weight loss) were recorded. Patients were divided into two groups regarding the time of MS diagnosis (before and during the COVID-19 pandemic). Binary logistic regression method was used to determine the possible association between patient-reported triggers and diagnosis time (before and during the pandemic) adjusting for possible confounders. Result(s): Of 920 participants, 670 (72.8 %) were female, and the mean age (SD) was 35.63 (+/-8.1). The majority of participants 637 (69.2%) had non-progressive forms of MS, and only 70 (7.6 %) needed assistance for ambulation. The time of MS diagnosis was before the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in 635 (69 %) participants. The differences between the most common first symptoms which led to MS diagnosis, visual type (n: 317 (49.9 %)) before the pandemic and sensory type (n: 170 (59.6 %)) after the pandemic were significant (p-values: 0.008 and <0.01 respectively). A stressful life event was the most common patient-reported MS trigger in both groups, (n: 356 (56.1%)) in patients who were diagnosed before the COVID-19 pandemic, and (n: 156 (54.7%)) in the latter group. Comparing two groups (MS diagnosed before and during the pandemic), economic problems (AOR: 1.81;95%ACI: 1.23-2.65) and job loss (AOR: 2.89;95%ACI: 1.37-6.08) were significantly more frequent stressful life event which trigger MS onset in the latter group while, the stress of occupational or educational exams (AOR: 0.52;95%ACI: 0.34-0.79) was more prevalent in the first group. Conclusion(s): Social triggers such as stressful life events are closely associated with MS onset that had been increased in some categories after the COVID-19 pandemic. If truly recognized, they could be used to prevent the development and exacerbation of the disease.Copyright © 2022
ABSTRACT
Introduction: It seems that Multiple sclerosis (MS) patients are at the higher risk for COVID-19 implications due to the use of immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive treatments. Obesity as a risk factor may lead to more adverse consequences. Relationship between obesity and COVID-19 risk and outcome in Iranian MS patients still remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the impact of BMI as a modifiable risk factors on the risk and outcomes of COVID-19 in Iranian patients with MS. Material(s) and Method(s): A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Sina hospital, Tehran, Iran. MS patients were asked to complete an online questionnaire in the google form format. Demographic information, clinical data consisting of MS disease-related factors, COVID-19-related factors, and anthropometric information were collected. In total, 492 patients were filled the questionnaire. BMI was categorized considering WHO's standard classification as underweight (BMI<18.5), normal weight (BMI>=18.5 and <25), overweight (BMI>=25 and <30), obesity type I (BMI>=30 and <35), and obesity type II (BMI>=35) (3). Result(s): The mean age was 36.7+/-8.2 and 395(80.3%) of them were women. 350(71.1%) of participants were suffered from RRMS. The most received MS drugs was Rituximab (36.0%). The mean BMI was 24.3+/-4.5 kg/m2. 234(47.6%) participants reported COVID-19 infection during the pandemic. 465(94.5%) of them were two doses vaccinated and 15(3%) of them were one-dose vaccinated. The odds ratio of COVID-19 infection was significantly 4.41 times more than the normal group in the type 2 obesity category (OR:5.41;95%CI:1.00-29.09) in the fully adjusted regression model. COVID-19 severity was significantly different in BMI groups (P:0.02), So that 11(8.6%) patients in normal weight group and 4(50%) of patients in type II obesity group were hospitalized due to COVID-19 infection. Respiratory symptoms (P:0.05) and gastrointestinal symptoms (P<0.01) were more prevalent among types I and II of obesity. On the other hand, no one in the obesity type I and II reported COVID-19 infection without any symptoms (P:0.04). Conclusion(s): The results of current study support that obesity could play a key role in susceptibility to COVID-19 infection and symptoms severity in MS patients. One of the issues that emerge from these findings is recommended that neurologists pay more attention on patients' BMI during this pandemic.Copyright © 2022
ABSTRACT
Background: There was no evidence about how COVID-19 can affect the neuroimmunological situation in patients who use immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory medications at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in June 2020. Many concerns have arisen among clinicians regarding the management of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) secondary to different limitations applied during this period including the closure of clinics, quarantine, and difficulty for face-to-face communication. Considering this, the potential use of social media in patient-physician communication has been addressed in this study. Material(s) and Method(s): In a cross-sectional study, potential effect of available social media technologies on the communication between patients with MS and MS fellowships at the time of the COVID-19 outbreak in Iran in 2020 has been evaluated. Two questionnaires were designed, one for patients and another for MS fellowships. Data were gathered and results were analyzed by SPSS 23.0 software. Result(s): Of 1700 patients, 408 answered the questionnaire wholly. Most of them used mobile for their medical connection (77.4%). Patients with Relapsing-Remitting had more connections with their doctors (p=0.045). Although MS patients preferred to visit their doctors in person and have face-to-face contact, COVID-19 infectious MS fellowships used social media technologies to solve most patients' problems, answer their questions, and help them stop worrying, and only visited emergency patients in MS clinics by following disease control strategy. Conclusion(s): Social media could help patients and neurologists to solve most problems without in-person visits during the COVID-19 pandemic.Copyright © 2022
ABSTRACT
Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is an autoimmune inflammatory disease of the central nervous system with astrocytopathy characteristics. Antibodies against aquaporin-4 water channels which are mainly located in astrocyte podocytes play an important role in NMOSD pathogenesis. Like other autoimmune disorders, it seems that both genetic and environmental factors are involved in NMOSD risk, but the role of environmental risk factors is more significant. Infections are known to be an effective factor not only in the incidence but also in the exacerbation of autoimmune diseases. In this chapter, the roles of microorganisms in two categories of viruses and bacteria in the pathogenesis and management of NMOSD patients are discussed. In this regard the relation between infection with tuberculosis, Helicobacter pylori, Epstein-Barr virus, SARS-CoV-2, varicella-zoster virus, dengue virus, cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex virus 2 and Zika virus, as well as gut microbiome and NMOSD occurrence are mentioned. On the other hand, susceptibility of NMOSD patients for developing infectious diseases due to receiving immunosuppressive drugs and the role of infection in NMOSD attack and disease exacerbation are outlined. © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2022.
ABSTRACT
Background: The national multiple sclerosis (MS) registry is aimed at monitoring and improving quality of care and providing feedback to improve health outcomes by systematic recording of data. In 2018, the nationwide MS registry of Iran (NMSRI) was initiated for collecting epidemiological data and information on health care provision for patients with MS. The aim of the current study was to introduce the role of implementing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) scale-up registry protocol in NMSRI and arrange the national MS generality with information obtained during the COVID-19 pandemic. Method(s): The NMSRI group set up a program with crucial elements to collect the data of patients with MS who developed COVID-19. All MS cases with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 were enrolled in this study. New elements were considered to be added into the dataset, including demographic characteristics, definite diagnosis of COVID-19 and its symptoms, history of comorbidities, history of medications and hospitalization, changes in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and infection outcomes. Result(s): The COVID-19 data collection program was designed in NMSRI to collect data of MS cases with COVID-19 infection. The data collection protocol was explained to neurologists through an online training workshop. To the date of the study, 21 centers from 17 provinces of Iran were involved in the COVID-19 databases promoting NMSRI and 612 participants were registered successfully. Conclusion(s): We extended an agreement on data collection and developed it in NMSRI with various contributors to discover a critical need for COVID-19 awareness and monitor clinical training in MS.Copyright © 2021 Iranian Neurological Association, and Tehran University of Medical Sciences Published by Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
ABSTRACT
Background: Now that the majority of the population has been immunized with two-dose vaccines, debates over the third booster dose have been raised. We studied the viewpoint of cases with multiple sclerosis (MS) on this matter. Method(s): In a cross-sectional study, a google form containing questions about participants' characteristics, the history of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and vaccination, and opinions on the third dose was designed. Result(s): Of 1067 responders, only 16 (1.5%) were not vaccinated at all. The most used vaccine type was Sinopharm BBIBP COVID-19 vaccine (BBIBP-CorV) (n = 1002, 93.9%). Generally, 58 (5.4%) cases were hospitalized due to COVID-19. Of those with full vaccination, 134 (13.3%) got COVID-19 infection after the second dose. Only 13 participants (1%) did not agree with the third dose, while 564 (53.0%) believed that a booster dose was needed. Of all, 488 (45.7%) declared that they did not have a final idea and would follow the instructions by the experts. A significant association was found between not receiving the first two doses and not believing in the third dose (P = 0.001). 692 patients declared their reasoning for the importance of the third dose. All the cases who thought the administered vaccine was not efficient enough had received Sinopharm BBIBP-CorV. Those who got infected after full vaccination were more uncertain about the efficacy of the vaccine [odds ratio (OR): 2.6, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.6-4.2]. Conclusion(s): It seems that the majority of the Iranian patients with MS expect the authorities to administer a third booster dose, especially if scientifically validated. Copyright © 2022 Iranian Neurological Association, and Tehran University of Medical Sciences Published by Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
ABSTRACT
Shortly after the onset of the coronavirus pandemic, different vaccines were developed to combat it. The vaccines had different mechanisms and triggered cellular and humoral immune responses against the virus. In addition to their positive effects, various side effects have been reported for them. They rarely cause severe complications. They can also rarely trigger latent infections. The present case report presents a patient who developed herpes simplex encephalitis after receiving the second dose of the Covaxin (BBV152). © 2022 Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
ABSTRACT
Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become a pandemic, and patients receiving immunosuppressive agents could be at a higher risk of the infection. Patients’ knowledge and behavior play a major role in their health. Physicians should provide patients with enough information regarding medication use, prevention strategies, and treatment choices in case of infec-tion. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the attitude and knowledge of Iranian patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) about COVID-19, as provided by physicians. Methods: A google form was designed, and the patients consented to fill out the survey. The participants’ basic characteristics were collected. Moreover, they were asked about COVID-19 transmission routes and prevention strategies, their concerns regarding MS-related checkups during the COVID-19 pandemic, COVID-19 infection tests, COVID-19 symptoms, and information they received from their physicians about what to do in case of COVID-19 infection. Results: Four hundred and ten forms were collected. The mean age of the patients and the mean duration of the disease were 34.5 ± 8 and 7.2 ± 5.7 years, respectively. Nearly 80% of the respondents believed that patients with MS were at a higher risk of COVID-19 infection, and 75% of them thought that wearing a face mask could prevent the infection transmission. Moreover, only 21% of 410 the physicians informed their patients of when to stop their medication if they were suspected to have COVID-19, and 22% of them informed their patients of where to refer in case of COVID-19 suspicion. Nearly half of all physicians prescribed immune-boosting supplements, such as selenium, zinc, and vitamin D. Conclusions: The results showed that Iranian MS patients had good knowledge regarding COVID-19 prevention strategies and transmission routes. However, they received less information from their physicians regarding medication use control, centers for admis-sion, and physician consultation in case of COVID-19 infection.
ABSTRACT
The new pandemic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) that is caused by a new strain of coronavirus, named severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARSCoV-2), has become an issue for governments and health care providers such as specialists including psychiatrists worldwide (1). Treatment strategies and vaccination for this disease are yet to be explored. Therefore, at this time, the best-proposed health measure to break the chain of transmission is social distancing or, in some instances, quarantine. In a recent systematic review published in Lancet, Brooks et al. (2) evaluated the psychological impacts of quarantine during the 2003 SARS outbreak and the 2014 Ebola outbreak. Accordingly, most of the reviewed studies reported adverse psychological effects, including post-traumatic stress symptoms, confusion, and anger (2). Delays in psychological interventions in such situations can lead to psychological damage to individuals who are involved (3). However, people with a pre-existing mental health problem such as anxiety or depressive disorder would be more vulnerable to experience adverse psychological effects of quarantine and social distancing.